Advertise Here
  • Why John Carter’s Failure Spells The Death Of Storytelling

    It is seven-thirty on a Monday night.

    I had paid seventeen dollars, bought the over-priced diet coke and popcorn without grousing, and sat myself down in the theatre, jamming the 3-D glasses down hard on my wide-nose and over my other set of actual practical (though still capable of enabling me to view the world in three glorious dimensions) and hunkered down. I suppressed the involuntary shiver at the back of my neck – no matter the season, the anticipatory chill of entering a movie theatre is the same. Caves located deep underground, that’s what I’m always reminded of. The world outside changes, but inside the temperature, the smell, the touch of the slimy walls and the loud silence remain the same.There is the thrill of exploration, there is the primal awareness of how your body fits into a space, there is the very distant knowledge in the back of your animal brain reminding you that death is inevitable for a moment – and because of circumstances – heightened for the duration.

    This is what the movies are to me. They always have been.

    My mother talks about taking me to the movies for the first time. It was Follow That Bird. I don’t remember going, but the flick came out in 1985 and I would’ve been not quite 2, so that’s not evidence of like, a suppressed memory or anything. Sesame Street was something I adored on a little screen, but sitting in the depths of the cave even beside my mother I can only imagine how deep my terror must have been to see affable Big Bird morphed into a giant-sized monster of a creature. We had to leave the theatre. What with all my sobbing.

    I have watched a lot of movies not because I’ve wanted to see them but because I’ve wanted to go to the movies and have that experience. A lot of people might not remember the zombie comedy flick My Boyfriend’s Back and faaaaair enough (I’ll be real, I own this now and you guys it does not hold up.) But when it came out in 1993 I was amped – comedy? Zombies? A pointed reference to one of my favorite oldies? Color me game! What really made the experience so memorable was not the movie itself, it was that, through some mean feat, the film’s marketers had crafted an ad campaign so cunning that my Dad wanted to see the movie too, making for a joyous father-daughter-zombie outing.

    There are only two movies I’ve ever walked out of – The Human Stain and Legally Blond (The reasons behind my leaving are neither here nor there nor are they particularly interesting). It never mattered what the film was I am always game, always, because of just how much the experience means to me. If that means I’m going to have to occasionally leave because really you guys I don’t think I can handle my practical friend Babs’ running commentary on Anthony Hopkins’s implausibility as a black man or because I was in the mood to deal with a film I viewed as homophobic – so be it! (See, irrelevant – not that interesting.)

    A lot of writers – paging Walker Percy – have used going to the movies as a metaphor for a sense of isolation from interpersonal interaction and true connection permeating our contemporary cultural. Which I can understand on the surface – a bunch of people, in the dark, not talking. But if I think about it for longer than a second I find myself talking about catharsis, that shared experience is the complete opposite of isolation, and how maybe it’s good we’re in the dark not looking at each other – so we can genuinely react. When an entire audience laughs at something – you know it’s funny because no one is laughing just because someone else is. In the dark there isn’t any space for social clues. In the dark, emotions are permitted, hell, encouraged even – there’s a reason people make out at movies. Or touch themselves, I guess that happens too.

    Sometimes the whole experience proves to be too much for me. If a film is edited just right, it can work me into a sustained form of suspenseful anxiety that is almost embarrassing to admit to. “Becca, why are you shaking? We are just eating hamburgers,” “Oh you know, I still am a bit freaked out about how Al Pacino couldn’t sleep and how maybe it was driving him to madness that will prevent him from SOLVING THE CASE.” “But…” “Just shut up and eat your burger while I quiver.” When I saw the Cell in theatres, I had to leave at one point and call my mom because I was worried I would be abducted and murdered later. I am, and will forever be, a pleasure to know.

    The inverse has happened as well. I’ve started bawling immediately after a film ha sended, not because it was particularly sad, but because as the lights come up and I know the story’s over I have to come to grips with the fact that a world I loved and felt as though I existed within has gone away. Elizabeth. A Life Less Ordinary. Kill Bill (BOTH OF THEM). METROPOLIS. BLADE RUNNER! Hell, when I was home last night and sitting down to watch TV with a bowl of day old couscous a commercial came on for the new 3-D Titanic and I PREEMPTIVELY STARTED BAWLING.

    I think there is a sort of jadedness that comes with how most folks view the movies now. Instead of going in with a sense of abandon, of eagerness for potential escape, we go in ready to rip something to shreds, insane, apparently racist shreds. We don’t trust the story. We don’t trust the storytellers. We don’t want to. The very notion of the willing suspension of disbelief – an integral component of all successful fiction in any form – seems to be evaporating. God, I sound like an old person saying this, and I don’t even care. I think it’s this attitude – in addition to yes, terrible marketing – that killed John Carter before it even opened. This criticism murdered a movie that twenty-years ago would have been rapturously new and different and taken up immediately by a group of die-hard fans. If those fans exist I haven’t met them. And I mean, I would know if they did.

    After all, I’m in this movie theatre seeing John Carter for the third time. Alone.

    Here’s where we make a joke about how it’s all for Taylor Kitsch’s abs (because DELICIOUS). But as I sit there, popcorn cold, stale and neglected. I feel the tears pooling in my eyes when my favorite sequences begin – Carter single-handedly fighting off an alien horde with incredible violence is intercut with Carter on earth discovering his burned out home and murdered family, Carter surveying the beauty of Barsoom at nightfall, the heart-pounding recounting of his plans to return to the planet he views as his home. In so many ways, it’s classic movie making. The knot in my throat, the familiar feeling of transportation, the awareness of this very real-seeming world was not real and the grief that comes once its over. I talk about my profound love for movies like Speed, Waterworld, the Mummy, and people laugh thinking I am being ironic and cute and I guess on one level I am. But the rest of me has never been more grave – my simple, emotional, reaction to these films, my inherent appreciation and love of the stories and the people in them – good AND bad – I think is a testimony to the essential importance of real story-telling, what real story telling should be, and that’s something I’ll testify to until my dying day.

    But not Speed 2, you guys. Speed 2 was just terrible.

Related Posts

Commenting Policy

FemPop reserves the rights to edit and/or delete comments that detract from fun and exciting conversation. Stay witty, use uppercase letters, and keep polite. Disagree! Prove your point without resorting to gaslighting or mansplaining! If you really bug us or have come here just to be nasty your comment will be deleted or worse...all the vowels will be removed and you'll look like an idiot.
  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=511039938 Raivn Swaim

    Beautiful! I know exactly what you mean. I teared up when I saw the Titanic in 3D ad as well. I tear up over Sex and the City previews, and just about anything that makes me happy in a theater. You described it beautifully.

    And I feel exactly the same way about Speed 2…so bad!

  • http://www.facebook.com/kevin.m.p.sanderson Kevin Sanderson

    John Carter is a wonderful movie. I’ve seen it a few times myself now and just don’t get all the negativity. It’s really odd to hear people say it sucks when they haven’t seen it. They just heard or assumed it does. Then you tell them how well it did in places like England, Australia, Mexico, Russia (especially well there) and now China, and it stops them in their tracks. I hope the Japanese really take to it when it opens there in mid-April (they had the better trailer).

    It’s a real shame it’s not doing better here in the US, where the John Carter story was born a hundred years ago and has provided inspiration more directly than indirectly for many movies. The movie is obviously a labor of love. You can see it on the screen. Commenters making posts about the actors they didn’t like or story points they couldn’t somehow get amaze me. The film is well done, the CG and animation is excellent, the story is a great melding of a couple John Carter stories with a few tweaks here and there, Lynn Collins is strong and wonderful, Taylor Kitsch is heroic and all the other great actors and performances don’t miss a beat. The art direction, costumes and the music, the editing, animation and visual effects are all Oscar quality. I’m serious.

    Liking movies is very subjective, but I think it would be more strongly “liked” if the negative press and comments weren’t out there. I think it dulls much of the enthusiasm. The haters remind me of an old friend who thought “Star Wars” was awful and just couldn’t enjoy it.

    • http://www.fempop.com/ Rebecca Jane Stokes

       Here, here! I didn’t know about it’s international success – thanks for the intel. This already furthers my opinion about this wonderful, underrated film.

  • Thespacemaster

    yeah the movie is not terrible i saw it leaked for a bit but than i stopped because it already intrigued me i just don’t get why so many people think its going to fail even the studio said even before it premiered that its expected to flop what kind of studio would say that to their own film i blame the poor marketing and the studios lack of confidence even the directer said that he is still going to make a sequel even it flops because he knows its the studios failure to promote it and the fact people believe others people reviews before seeing it with their own eyes although i think it is a good idea that he should have spend less on the budget to make the film. still no 1 reason for this film getting bad credit is because of bad publicity .

  • http://twitter.com/RusWornom RusWornom

    You are so right, with this post, and in so many ways.  John Carter is better than classic movie-making.  It’s iconic movie-making.  The scene you describe is a ultra-classic pulp trope, and is done beautifully here.  All it needed was Carter to gesture with his left hand and gutturally say, “Who’s the next to die?”

  • syraph

    Well done. Pretty much expressed how I feel about this movie but in a much better way than I possibly could. But I’ll share my experience as best as I can.

    Initially watched the movie as a “filler” in theaters, was dropped off early to the mall, friends weren’t supposed to show up for a few hours had plenty of time and this movie was playing at just the right time. I had been semi interested in it, from the first two trailers (combine them and you get an awesome trailer, view just one and the movie may not be interesting to a lot of people).

    I have no clue what the marketing of this movie was like as I don’t watch much TV, all I know is people were annoyed by it, but regardless I had already made up my mind to watch it after the first two trailers as I said before. Once the reviews started pouring in though, I started getting disappointed, that maybe my instincts were wrong, this movie may not be all that good after all, I should put off watching it, my friends had pretty much decided solely based on the reviews that they weren’t going to waste their time.

    Thankfully that aforementioned day, I ended up watching this movie to pass the time and boy was I glad. As soon as the movie got to John Carter (with the visual of old NYC mixed with the great score by Michael Giacchino) I knew I was in for something special.

    By the end of the movie I was really surprised at the reviews this movie had gotten as it was actually good, and hence decided to check out the reviews once I got home (as I had not read them in depth.

    Finally reading them, I was really dumbfounded at some of the  “critiques” this film had received. Aspects where other movies got a free pass all of a sudden were taboo for this movie. Some reviews were treating the story in this movie as though it was supposed to be completely new or mindblowing. Some were saying the plot is too simple, some were saying it is too confusing and not simple at all… very inconsistent as though the reviewers were trying to find faults in the movie whether they existed or not (not saying they were).

    About half of the negative reviews are looking at the budget and then judging the movie which shouldn’t even be a factor, especially when judging the story. Now if a higher budget meant that the ticket price for the movie would cost higher, then it would be a legitimate point to bring up but that is not the case. It costs just as much as any other 3d or 2d movie showing to go to it. If a movie like True Grit cost 250 million to make instead of 38 million how does it effect me? I get the same enjoyment out of it regardless, it doesn’t dampen the impact of the story or all of a sudden make the acting not as good.

    The only people who should be concerned with the budget are the people who released the movie, it should have no effect on reviews of the movie whatsoever but unfortunately it was held against John Carter in this instance. Personally, I hold John Carter in a higher regard than Avatar (another movie with a huge budget), and a lot of the Star Wars movies (not all, so chill people). It has become one of my favorite sci-fi movies and I have watched it twice already (going for a third time in a few days with my brother).

    I think I was all over the place in my post but hopefully I got some points across.

  • http://twitter.com/aparkerddm Akweli Parker

    Rebecca, wonderfully done. I saw John Carter after reading one of your previous articles and shared quite similar reactions — though I doubt I could have voiced what I felt nearly as eloquently. The film was classic Joseph Campbell — what many derided as formulaic, but what I believe the rest of us recognized as just solid, engaging storytelling.
    Rather than being a cynical cash grab like some of the *other* so-called blockbusters in theaters this summer, JC actually did place a heavy emphasis on the fundamentals of storytelling. The director (despite his infamous behavior that allegedly helped wreck the project) loved and cared for the characters and the story itself. As a result, when the movie was over, many of us who “got it” desperately wanted there to be a sequel … though we already knew what the likelihood of that was.
    Contrary to your headline, I think there will always be an appreciative, paying audience for quality storytelling. Witness The Hunger Games. Witness the comments to your well-penned article. Thanks, as always, for the thoughtful commentary!

Advertise Here

Share

Share on Tumblr