Advertise Here
  • The Gender Of Brave’s Leads Brings Out The Curious, The Stupid And The Tomboys

    Instead of a review of Brave I’m going to just get right into analysis of the film and the public’s response to it. So be wary of spoilers because they’re there. If you haven’t seen the film then STOP READING and GO SEE IT. Kelly MacDonald, Billy Connelly and Emma Thompson fashion an instantly believable and loveable family, the animation is some of the best to date–particularly the way the light moves through the trees and the various woodland creatures’ fur moves, and in a departure from nearly every Disney and Pixar film ever, both parents survive. Also a maid’s cleavage and three young boys repeatedly steal the show.

    And if you are a teenage girl or the mother of a teenage girl SEE IT WITH YOUR MOTHER/TEENAGER. You will not be disappointed. If you are email me and I’ll send you some blackbottom cupcakes as an apology. They will be laced with cyanide because I’ll be horrified you didn’t like the film.

    I was a tomboy and in many ways still am. As a child I hated wearing skirts and dresses. I dreamed of the simplicity and elegance of a suit and tie and looked at my brother (four years younger) in jealousy as he got to wear the clothes I desperately wanted to wear. I had a cape so I could be Superman and a pair of six shooters so I could be the greatest cowboy to ever live. My grandmother coyly told me that if I could kiss my elbow I’d become a boy and I spent one entire Fourth of July sitting on a tombstone (the graveyard was the best place to see the fireworks and we celebrate life or some such) trying to put my lips to the elephant rough skin of my elbow.

    Perhaps there was a strand of self loathing misogyny lurking in my baby brain, but mainly I just liked being me. My parents and grandmothers loved to “gender police” me and explain how a proper girl dressed and behaved but thanks to a divorce and two working parents I had enough time to myself to fully bask in my gender neutral way of life and came out pretty awesome (the parents weren’t actually THAT bad–much of their objections were a kind of a generational thing).

    Watching Merida, another tomboy, balk at the rules of “femininity” being forcefully applied struck a chord in me. I was that girl. I knew her well and sympathized whole-heartedly.  Because what was being forced upon her wasn’t femininity, it was a very specific idea of how a girl should behave. One developed not to help women but to hinder them.

    But you know what? I also got Elinor. While I may hate the “a lady…” spiel I can appreciate where it comes from for her character (and for the older women in my own life). There are rules that govern social decorum and they must be obeyed. Rules of society must be maintained. Tomboys are rebels within the society–breaking and bending ageless rules and provoking their arbiters. Just as I may struggle to understand certain extremely progressive ideas and concepts so do the generations before me. We’re all a half-step behind the ones who follow us.

    The cleverness of the conflict between Merida and Elinor is how neatly they fall into two socially acceptable and popular concepts of womanhood. Elinor is prim and stately– the peacekeeper for the whole of the kingdom. Yes her husband is the great Bear King and a physically impressive man, but it’s Elinor who makes certain the clans don’t kill each other and it’s because of a carefully cultivated image–one that she’s attempting to pass onto her daughter.

    And her daughter is physical. Rowdy. Independent and aggressive.

    They’re both headstrong. Stubborn. Opinionated. Neither is necessarily right. The film doesn’t condemn either for how the represent femininity. When they have their destructive fight both women immediately regret it. They’re so sure that the path they’ve laid out is the right one–but they’re both still a little empathetic. Elinor more so than her daughter (and that, as suggested by the film, is because of age and not her tomboy nature).

    It’s only when Merida resolves to change her fate with a witch’s spell that the détente crumbles. And then they piece themselves and their relationship back together again. Each gives a little. Each takes a little. It’s utterly perfect and the rare time in a children’s film where the relationship between mother and daughter is the focus point.

    There is no outright villain in this plot except, perhaps, pride.

    As natural and affecting as the film is for me and many others it’s brought out something interesting in critics. Ebert, in a very spoilery review, says it ”seems at a loss to deal with her [Merida] as a girl and makes her a sort of honorary boy.” That comment is so mind-numbingly awful, misguided and silly that I’m loathe to say much more on the subject other than a very loud “Seriously Ebert?!”

    Entertainment Weekly posits that because Merida bristles at “traditional” gender roles and doesn’t express interest in her suitors she could be gay. Jezebel and AfterEllen wonder the same thing (though to be fair to AE when you’re queer you tend to gay goggle EVERYTHING–it’s how we have Swan Queen).

    Merida isn’t defined by her sexuality, and as much as the film is about two women mired in a battle of what constitutes femininity, Merida isn’t really defined by her gender either. The crux of the story isn’t “will Elinor let Merida choose her own suitor” or “will Merida give up her bow.” It is “will this parent and child learn how to communicate?” While the story might not be as rich with the sexes changed it would still be very much the same story. Boys experience gender policing just as acutely as girls and if you don’t believe me turn on the tv and watch a dad give a “be a man” speech.

    We’ve grown used to this story when told about a boy and his father. Familial communication is, after all, the central theme of more than one children’s film. In fact Pixar’s most successful film to date, Finding Nemo shares many similarities. But because that film was about a boy, the “status quo” gender, it was unnecessary to analyze it. And look at Buzz Lightyear in the original Toy Story or Remy in Ratatouille. Like Merida they express no specific sexuality, yet the media didn’t exactly dive into articles pondering their sexuality days after the films crushed the box office.

    Merida and Elinor are the first sole heroines ever in a Pixar film, and Merida is the first “Disney Princess” not embroiled in a love affair. And as the film breaks ground and provides girls and boys with a teenage hero for whom sex and heteronormativity aren’t everything the status quo will buck. What really shouldn’t even be up for debate will be examined ad nauseum, and older film critics will stick their feet in their mouths because the last teenage girl they knew had a bee hive and wore gloves even when it wasn’t cold.

Related Posts

Commenting Policy

FemPop reserves the rights to edit and/or delete comments that detract from fun and exciting conversation. Stay witty, use uppercase letters, and keep polite. Disagree! Prove your point without resorting to gaslighting or mansplaining! If you really bug us or have come here just to be nasty your comment will be deleted or worse...all the vowels will be removed and you'll look like an idiot.
  • Mollie Muse

    “She has no interest in boys, so she must be gay.” WTF, Movie Critics??!!

  • drwyatt

    Not sure Kevin McKidd gets your point. He keeps focusing on whether Merida will get married in a sequel, which she will if they truly make one.

    • http://fempop.com/ Alex Cranz

      Oh Kevin McKidd! Mad bum bums.

      Though I’m hoping he’s just saying that because he plays one of the potential suitors and is angling to return.

      Still I don’t think Pixar will do a sequel. They’re the rare group that refuses to do sequels usually.

      • drwyatt

        Just saw it mentioned somewhere today that it had done so well they announced they would. wish I could remember where

        • http://fempop.com/ Alex Cranz

          That’s odd. Success is usually one of the least important contributing factors to Pixar producing sequels. It’s why we still don’t have one for Finding Nemo or The Incredibles.

          If they do do one I’ll be really surprised if the introduce a romantic partner for Merida. Though I could see her leading her suitors on an adventure.

  • http://twitter.com/captainsharmie captain sharmie

    great article. i totally understand why people read merida as queer and i say more power to them, but i think of it in a fanfiction-y, speculative sort of way, not a ‘will they make a movie where she marries a girl’ sort of way. i’m just way more excited about a movie that’s pretty much just about a girl and her mother.

  • jci

    Yeah I know I’m realllllly late to the party but I just read this and I needed to comment. The tomboy trope has been around for a long time and Merida has a long list of literary and cinematic sisters who walked this trail before her. I liked Brave well enough but the gender representations chaffed and I think critisism is waranted. The tomboy image is a rather antiquated idea. That the film chooses to present Merida’s behavior as transgressing gender expectations is very old fashioned. Brave accounts for this by having the story take place in a fictional “past”. That’s all fine and good but I’d prefer to see a female charater who’s just exactly who she is without it needing to be called into question at all. Let her enjoy sports and rough housing, but why present it as outside of the norm at all? Same for the boys who are just as boxed into specific gender behaviors. I think it’s also worth noting that Merida does on the other hand wear a dress throughout the film and always has her long flowing hair. So she “acts” like a boy but still looks like a proper feminine girl. Some of my discomfort certainly comes from the fact that this is a family film, likely to been seen by many young girls and boys for many years to come. It’s a shame that this was the best Pixar could come up with. I know they can do better. This is hardly intended to be a condemnation of the film as a whole (i’ve seen it twice!) but damnit they could have done something better than this.

    PS: I think you’re misunderstanding the intent of Eberts comment. He’s being a bit backhanded in his criticism, but he’s pointing out the limited gender expectations (i.e. the best the film can do is paint Merida as an “honorary boy” as opposed to simply a girl who likes archery, no more, no less.

Advertise Here

Share

Share on Tumblr